Moderator: MaXX2
Tim wrote:Fine here Wobbs...just fine.
wobbs wrote:1024 x 768
Poacher wrote:Tim wrote:Fine here Wobbs...just fine.
Get a smaller screen
aj wrote:.
you don't think that nice mr bobblyone is going to be influenced by you pair of cooonts do you...
regards
aj
it's tooooo friggin small
regards
aj
wobbs wrote:If you feel inadequate go see a councilor
But set your screen size at 1024 x 768 unless you need it more for art work
also use the F11 key for full screen.
MaXX2 wrote:
MaXX2 wrote:rGotta say, I agreed with ya matey. No point in posting pics ya can't actually see properly. A 'team pic' or a nice long multi bike shot at that size would be a blurr. Have to say though- that sorts it fer me Best o' both worlds .
Just one thing (and probly already dealt with) but does the base image size of 2000x1000 also apply to 1000x2000 images, given that they're the same size (capacity wise) anyway If not, is there a prob with making it that way
="MaXX2" rGotta say, I agreed with ya matey. No point in posting pics ya can't actually see properly. A 'team pic' or a nice long multi bike shot at that size would be a blurr. Have to say though- that sorts it fer me Best o' both worlds .
Just one thing (and probly already dealt with) but does the base image size of 2000x1000 also apply to 1000x2000 images, given that they're the same size (capacity wise) anyway If not, is there a prob with making it that way
= Correct for off shore links="aj" cordin te the bobbly... it's a width issue .. so he's set the perameters at 640x640 to allow either portrait or landscape to occupy up to the 640 pixel size..
= Wrongbut tit does need extending to 800 to use the full potential of the available forum width and the picture content...
= 1/3rd is not available1/3rd of the available width not being used
= Correct If these pictures are off shore links... also means that every pic we have posted over the past will have to be resized if you ever want to use it again
Tim wrote:I need Tigger to help me out here...
Tim wrote:I'm goping for a lie down again....
Tigger wrote:Tim wrote:I need Tigger to help me out here...
2 hopes !Tim wrote:I'm goping for a lie down again....
where you GOPING?!?
for a soclet?
wobbs wrote:
Here's one for you using the functions available within the forum
Blackmagic Andy & Jill
A couple of points
bigger pictures take longer to load
My priority is to not photobucket/other picture hosts
how much does photobucket cost for hosting?
how much does cost for hosting?
which option gives the better qualty pics?
Tim wrote:
Followed that Link Wobbs....errr, what am I supposed to see?....the pics on that last page were all fabby...the size was great.
No your settings are fine Tim, aj has his settings higher for artwork 2048 x 1536 probably,I thought or was led to believe by peeps such as aj that I got my monitor settings wrong... is that still the case.?
Return to Logging In And Other Teething problems
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests