restrictive width...

[aj]

.

the forum now only occupies 2/3rds of the width of my screen ffs....

bobbly... wider.. wider .. then we can post bigger pics too eh.. eh



regards
aj

[Tim]

Fine here Wobbs...just fine.

[Poacher]

Fine here Wobbs...just fine.

Ditto here Tim

AyeJay.......

Get a smaller screen

[aj]

.

you don't think that nice mr bobblyone is going to be influenced by you pair of cooonts do you...

regards
aj

[wobbs]

1024 x 768

[aj]

1024 x 768

you need off me lad ..... it's tooooo friggin small

regards
aj

[Tigger]

Fine here Wobbs...just fine.

Get a smaller screen

or better glasses

[Poacher]

.

you don't think that nice mr bobblyone is going to be influenced by you pair of cooonts do you...

regards
aj

Well actually..............

The nice mr bobblyone must be listneing to us..........

Coz IT AINT CHANGING

[wobbs]

it's tooooo friggin small

regards
aj

If you feel inadequate go see a councilor
But set your screen size at 1024 x 768 unless you need it more for art work
also use the F11 key for full screen.

[Tim]

counsellor..........

[MaXX2]

[MaXX2]

'kin clever that is. Nice one Wobbs

[aj]

If you feel inadequate go see a councilor
But set your screen size at 1024 x 768 unless you need it more for art work
also use the F11 key for full screen.

can't afford to reduce screen size bobbly... ... come on... keep up with the times

full screen all the time.. still a 3rd to fill...

you lot must all be usin yer sat nav screens ffs



regards
aj

[aj]

100208-31web.JPG

waxilax... never seen kay lookin so tiny.. she bin on a diet.

regards
aj

[MaXX2]

rGotta say, I agreed with ya matey. No point in posting pics ya can't actually see properly. A 'team pic' or a nice long multi bike shot at that size would be a blurr. Have to say though- that sorts it fer me Best o' both worlds .

Just one thing (and probly already dealt with) but does the base image size of 2000x1000 also apply to 1000x2000 images, given that they're the same size (capacity wise) anyway If not, is there a prob with making it that way

[aj]

rGotta say, I agreed with ya matey. No point in posting pics ya can't actually see properly. A 'team pic' or a nice long multi bike shot at that size would be a blurr. Have to say though- that sorts it fer me Best o' both worlds .

Just one thing (and probly already dealt with) but does the base image size of 2000x1000 also apply to 1000x2000 images, given that they're the same size (capacity wise) anyway If not, is there a prob with making it that way

cordin te the bobbly... it's a width issue .. so he's set the perameters at 640x640 to allow either portrait or landscape to occupy up to the 640 pixel size..

but tit does need extending to 800 to use the full potential of the available forum width and the picture content...



regards
aj

don't know why yours has come out smaller than 640 laxxi ...
unless you save it on yer hard drive or uploded it to a web host at that size


this is max width at the moment



1/3rd of the available width not being used ... also means that every pic we have posted over the past will have to be resized if you ever want to use it again

[MaXX2]

Nip back up to the piccy of Kay and the Babe- click on it and it comes out wider than the one you've posted. It's a thumbnail at 400x400 max, but click on it and there's some scope for size. The base (larger) pic is just a sample I pulled up off the hard drive so I have a clue what a 2000x1000 image actually looks like. Also, no idea if the same width reestriction to the 2000x1000 images.

If it does and there's adequate bandwidthe etc would it be possible to have restrictions on 1000 high OR 1000 wide. Cracked it that way.

Anyhoo- seems a good idea in principle- fast download of images and if ya want a closer look, click it up

[Tim]

You issa soooo full of sheeeeeeiyte....full width max pixel sheeeeiyte...and ya can't even get the lighting reet on ya pics....Lawdy fookin Lawdy.....Never have I read so much sheeeiyte....that I can't understand...

Rugrats

Yim.

[wobbs]

="MaXX2" rGotta say, I agreed with ya matey. No point in posting pics ya can't actually see properly. A 'team pic' or a nice long multi bike shot at that size would be a blurr. Have to say though- that sorts it fer me Best o' both worlds .

Just one thing (and probly already dealt with) but does the base image size of 2000x1000 also apply to 1000x2000 images, given that they're the same size (capacity wise) anyway If not, is there a prob with making it that way

Picture Dimensions changed
Max pixel size hosted by = 2048w x 1536h

="aj" cordin te the bobbly... it's a width issue .. so he's set the perameters at 640x640 to allow either portrait or landscape to occupy up to the 640 pixel size..

= Correct for off shore links

but tit does need extending to 800 to use the full potential of the available forum width and the picture content...

= Wrong

please check this link and tell me whats wrong with the forum, pictures are at 800 x 600 viewtopic.php?f=9&t=14678




this is max width at the moment = Correct for off shore links

1/3rd of the available width not being used

= 1/3rd is not available

... also means that every pic we have posted over the past will have to be resized if you ever want to use it again

= Correct If these pictures are off shore links
To use these pictures again use the [url] tags instead of the [img] tags to display as a link
or upload them to to get better quality/size

Here's one for you using the functions available within the forum
Blackmagic Andy & Jill

A couple of points
bigger pictures take longer to load
My priority is to not photobucket/other picture hosts
how much does photobucket cost for hosting?
how much does cost for hosting?
which option gives the better qualty pics?

[Tim]

I need Tigger to help me out here...

Followed that Link Wobbs....errr, what am I supposed to see?...has it been differented made ..or the pics on the last page of that thread..y'know the hunnerds and hunnerds of pics been smallably made? ...Wha'eva....the pics on that last page were all fabby...the size was great.

Going back to when I used to moan about the pics being too big...I thought or was led to believe by peeps such as aj that I got my monitor settings wrong...never changed them cos it made the words too small for me and don't really know what I'm doing on a poota anyroad..I'm a fookin biker for fooks sakes..and a steelworker...fooking pixels etc does my 'ead in. So was it an issue with my monitor settings or what? I was convinced I was the tvat that got it wrong?...or is that still the case.?


Now you come up with geeky talk...it may give Extremist a stalker but it does fook all for me...1000x1200....one third available one third not....fookin Off Shore ? ....go get a room you two..or can we have a Geek Pic Size Section....mebbe aj could Moderate it.....

I'm going for a lie down again....it's all getting too much for me....alter old pics? .....Oooooer missus.....

Dunno how you got the patience Wobbs.....

[Tigger]

I need Tigger to help me out here...

2 hopes !

I'm goping for a lie down again....

where you GOPING?!?

for a soclet?

[Tim]

I need Tigger to help me out here...

2 hopes !

I'm goping for a lie down again....

where you GOPING?!?

for a soclet?

As I have said in the past ...big clumsy fingers me...and the next time I see you , you'll get my full flookin flist in ya kite...

[aj]

Here's one for you using the functions available within the forum
Blackmagic Andy & Jill

andyjill.jpg

A couple of points
bigger pictures take longer to load
My priority is to not photobucket/other picture hosts
how much does photobucket cost for hosting?
how much does cost for hosting?
which option gives the better qualty pics?

fekme.. kacktragic has a gun in his hand....

photobucket is free... only used it cus cus it was easier than the our own... well.. to me at the time anyhoo
no probs revisiting it and or using it... where the fek is it then..please .. link would be good ... and i'll have a play

but it looks like we is makin progress.... once i have my head round it i'll have a quiet word with the tvat too
just away looking at my offshore investments at the mo just incase they have shrunk too

regards
aj

[Tim]

Looks more like The Crew have gaffered you...

[wobbs]

Followed that Link Wobbs....errr, what am I supposed to see?....the pics on that last page were all fabby...the size was great.

take a look where aj's avatar is

And there it was GONE the pic size has pushed it to the bottom of his post

I thought or was led to believe by peeps such as aj that I got my monitor settings wrong... is that still the case.?

No your settings are fine Tim, aj has his settings higher for artwork 2048 x 1536 probably,
those settings reduce the forum.